Elision in contraction (3-3)

 

Contraction 

We can see elision clearly in contracted forms (e.g., I’ll, she’s, he’d). Vowels or consonants, or both, can be elided in contraction. Contractions are a necessary ingredient for rhythm and clarity since by reducing them, we can emphasize content words. If we do not use a contraction when expected, we are signaling something different. For example, the following two sentences convey different meaning:


He’s finished his homework.

He has finished his homework.


“He’s finished his homework” states a fact, but “He has finished his homework” signals something like a surprise or an emphasis. So we should use a contracted form when expected.

Pronunciation of contracted words

Contracted words sound different from what we expect, so we need to know how they sound. These are common contractions and their sounds:


I'm rhymes with dime.

you're sounds the same as your/yore. 

he's and she’s (is, has) rhyme with bees.

it's (is, has) sounds the same as its.

we're rhymes with beer.

they're sounds the same as their/there.

I've rhymes with five

you've rhymes with move

here's (is, has) sounds the same as hears

there's (is, has) sounds the same as theirs

who’s sounds the same as whose

why’re (why are) sounds the same as wire

why’d (why did, why had) sounds the same as wide

how've you (how have you) sounds like "how view "

we've sounds the same as weave

they've rhymes with dave

I'd (had, would) sounds the same as eyed

you'd (had, would) rhymes with renewed

he'd (had, would) sounds the same as heed

she'd rhymes with he'd

we'd sounds the same as weed

they'd rhymes with paid

I'll sounds the same as aisle/isle

you'll sounds the same as yule

he'll sounds the same as heel/heal

she'll rhymes with he'll

we'll sounds the same as wheel

might have sounds like might of

Negative contractions

Contractions allow us to de-emphasize expected use of function words so that we can emphasize important words. Clearly, negation words are important as they change meaning entirely. So contractions with negative words are pronounced clearly, while affirmative contractions are reduced. That is, while affirmative contractions are said quickly, quietly, at a low pitch with a schwa vowel sound, the negative contractions are stressed with clearly articulated vowel sounds. For example, compare the following sounds: 


She’s happy vs She isn’t happy

He’ll do it vs He won’t do it

We’re going vs We aren’t going

She’ll go vs She won’t go

She would talk vs She wouldn’t talk

We can go vs We can’t go

She could hear you vs She couldn’t hear you

You should eat that vs You shouldn’t eat that

You should’ve done that vs You shouldn't have done that (/sʊdənəv/). 

You would have told him  vs You wouldn't have told him (/wʊdənəv/)

I’ve had a drink vs I haven't had a drink 

Inferring elided sounds

As we can see, many of the contracted forms sound the same: e.g., she’s, he’d. We can infer which is said through our knowledge of the grammar structure of the sentence. 

 

She’s coming. (she is)

She’s gone. (she has)

He'd go if he could. (he would)

She said he'd gone. (he had)

How'd he do it? (how did, how would)

How’d he done it? (how had)

 

This inference method to find an omitted sound does not work in certain situations, like “won't’’ and “want to,” or “can” and “can’t,” since in these similar sounding pairs, the verb root form is used for both. “Won’t” is a contraction of “will not.” “Won’t’” and “want” are pronounced differently due to their vowel sounds. “Won’t” is pronounced /woʊnt/, but “want” is pronounced /wɑnt/. So, “won’t” has a longer vowel than “want.” 



CAN vs CAN’T

The /t/ in the ‘nt’ cluster can be elided (cf., see the elision in consonant clusters in the following section). When ‘t’ is dropped, “can” and “can’t” can sound the same. There are enough differences, though, to tell whether the speaker said “can” or “can’t.” First, "can" in its normal use is a weak form, so its vowel is reduced to a schwa. By contrast, “can’t” is a full strong sound, so its vowel is long and clearly articulated. In other words, “can” is /kən/, but “can’t” is /kæn/. Secondly, there is no break between “can” and the following verb, but there is a break with “can’t” since /t/ is held. Listen to these paired examples: 


I can (/kən/) do that vs I can’t (/kæn/) do that.

She says he can (/kən/) come vs She says he can’t (/kæn/) come.


But, if “can” is used for emphasis, it retains the full vowel sound. So the “can” with emphasis can sound the same as “can’t.”


I’ll appreciate it if you CAN (/kæn/) help  vs  I can’t (/kæn/) help you.



Comments